4.6 Article

The caspase-like sites of proteasomes, their substrate specificity, new inhibitors and substrates, and allosteric interactions with the trypsin-like sites

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 278, Issue 38, Pages 35869-35877

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M303725200

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM46147-10, GM51923-08, R01 GM046147] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Proteasomes are the primary sites for protein degradation in mammalian cells. Each proteasome particle contains two chymotrypsin-like, two trypsin-like, and two caspase-like proteolytic sites. Previous studies suggest a complex network of allosteric interactions between these catalytic and multiple regulatory sites. We used positional scanning combinatorial substrate libraries to determine the extended substrate specificity of the caspase-like sites. Based on this analysis, several new substrates were synthesized, the use of which confirmed earlier observations that caspase-like sites ( often termed postglutamyl peptide hydrolase) cleave after aspartates better than after glutamates. Highly selective inhibitors of the caspase-like sites were also generated. They stimulated trypsin-like activity of yeast 20 S proteasomes up to 3-fold but not when binding of the inhibitor to the caspase-like sites was prevented in a mutant carrying an uncleaved propeptide. Although substrates of the caspase-like sites allosterically inhibit the chymotrypsin-like activity, inhibitors of the caspase-like sites do not affect the chymotrypsin-like sites. Furthermore, when caspase-like sites were occupied by the uncleaved propeptide or inhibitor, their substrates still inhibited the chymotrypsin-like activity. Thus, occupancy of the caspase-like sites stimulates the trypsin-like activity of proteasomes, but substrates of the caspase-like sites inhibit the chymotrypsin-like activity by binding to a distinct noncatalytic site.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available