4.7 Article

Self-similar models for the mass profiles of early-type lens galaxies

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 595, Issue 1, Pages 29-42

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/377356

Keywords

galaxies : elliptical and lenticular, cD; galaxies : structure; gravitational lensing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We introduce a self-similar mass model for early-type galaxies and constrain it using the aperture mass-radius relations determined from the geometries of 22 gravitational lenses. The model consists of two components: a concentrated component, which traces the light distribution, and a more extended power-law component (rho proportional to r(-n)), which represents the dark matter. We find that lens galaxies have total mass profiles that are nearly isothermal, or slightly steeper, on the several-kiloparsec radial scale spanned by the lensed images. In the limit of a single-component, power-law radial profile, the model implies n = 2.07 +/- 0.13, consistent with isothermal ( n = 2). Models in which mass traces light are excluded at higher than 99% confidence. An n = 1 cusp (such as the Navarro-Frenk-White profile) requires a projected dark matter mass fraction of f(cdm) = 0.22 +/- 0.10 inside two effective radii. These are the best statistical constraints yet obtained on the mass profiles of lenses and provide clear evidence for a small but nonzero dark matter mass fraction in the inner regions of early-type galaxies. In addition, we derive the first strong-lensing constraint on the relation between the stellar mass-to-light ratio Y and galaxy luminosity L, Y proportional to L0.14(-0.12)(+0.16) which is consistent with the relation suggested by the fundamental plane. Finally, we apply our self-similar mass models to current problems regarding the interpretation of time delays and flux ratio anomalies in gravitational lens systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available