4.0 Review

Preclinical Biomarkers of Parkinson Disease

Journal

ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY
Volume 68, Issue 1, Pages 22-30

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archneurol.2010.321

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson Research
  2. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [5U10NS044441-07]
  3. Clinical Center for the Study of Neuroprotection from PD
  4. National Parkinson Foundation through Foundation Center of Excellence at Baylor College of Medicine
  5. Shanghai Municipal Health Bureau [2010106]
  6. National Basic Research Program of China (the 973 Program) [2011CB707500]
  7. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [U10NS044441] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The search for markers of preclinical Parkinson disease (PD) is becoming increasingly important because pathogenesis-targeted neuroprotective strategies are being developed for future use in at-risk populations, even before clinical onset of disease. Advances in clinical recognition of early symptoms and signs, development of new neuroimaging probes and technologies, identification of new neuropathological markers of PD, and breakthroughs in genetics and basic neuroscience are gradually translating into better understanding of predisposing and preclinical factors that lead to progressive neurodegeneration. Coupled with system biology tools, progress is being made in the identification of new genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, lipidomic, and metabolomic molecules and new signaling pathways that are relevant to the pathogenesis of neurodegeneration in PD. These new tools will be critical not only in the discovery of sensitive, specific, and reliable biomarkers of preclinical PD but also in the development of tests that will aid in the early detection and differential diagnosis of parkinsonian disorders and in monitoring disease progression. Arch Neurol. 2011; 68(1): 22-30

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available