4.0 Article

Impulse Control Disorders in Parkinson Disease A Cross-Sectional Study of 3090 Patients

Journal

ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY
Volume 67, Issue 5, Pages 589-595

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archneurol.2010.65

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Boehringer Ingelheim
  2. BrainCells
  3. Merck Serono
  4. Novartis
  5. Ovation
  6. Wyeth
  7. Somaxon
  8. Mohegan Sun Casino
  9. Forest Laboratories pharmaceuticals
  10. National Center for Responsible Gaming and its affiliate
  11. Institute for Research on Gambling Disorders
  12. Teva
  13. Allergan
  14. Osmotica
  15. Biogen
  16. General Electric
  17. Kyowa
  18. Neurologix
  19. Synosia
  20. Ceregene
  21. Eisai
  22. Medtronic
  23. Prestwick
  24. Solvay
  25. Taro

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context: Anassociation between dopamine-replacement therapies and impulse control disorders (ICDs) in Parkinson disease(PD) has been suggested in preliminary studies. Objectives: To ascertain point prevalence estimates of 4 ICDs in PD and examine their associations with dopamine-replacement therapies and other clinical characteristics. Design: Cross-sectional study using an a priori established sampling procedure for subject recruitment and raters blinded to PD medication status. Patients: Three thousand ninety patients with treated idiopathic PD receiving routine clinical care at 46 movement disorder centers in the United States and Canada. Main Outcome Measures: The Massachusetts Gambling Screen score for current problem/pathological gambling, the Minnesota Impulsive Disorders Interview score for compulsive sexual behavior and buying, and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders research criteria for binge-eating disorder. Results: An ICD was identified in 13.6% of patients (gambling in 5.0%, compulsive sexual behavior in 3.5%, compulsive buying in 5.7%, and binge-eating disorder in 4.3%), and 3.9% had 2 or more ICDs. Impulse control disorders were more common in patients treated with a dopamine agonist than in patients not taking a dopamine agonist (17.1% vs 6.9%; odds ratio [OR], 2.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.08-3.54; P<.001). Impulse control disorder frequency was similar for pramipexole and ropinirole (17.7% vs 15.5%; OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.94-1.57; P=.14). Additional variables independently associated with ICDs were levodopa use, living in the United States, younger age, being unmarried, current cigarette smoking, and a family history of gambling problems. Conclusions: Dopamine agonist treatment in PD is associated with 2-to 3.5-fold increased odds of having an ICD. This association represents a drug class relationship across ICDs. The association of other demographic and clinical variables with ICDs suggests a complex relationship that requires additional investigation to optimize prevention and treatment strategies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available