4.4 Review

In vivo 1H-[13C]-NMR spectroscopy of cerebral metabolism

Journal

NMR IN BIOMEDICINE
Volume 16, Issue 6-7, Pages 339-357

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/nbm.847

Keywords

cerebral metabolism; TCA cycle; neurotransmitter cycle; C-13 substrates; H-1-[C-13] -NMR spectroscopy; glutamate; glutamine; GABA

Funding

  1. NIAAA NIH HHS [K02 AA 13430, 1P50 AA 12870] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIBIB NIH HHS [R01 EB 002097] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NICHD NIH HHS [P01 HD 32573] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK 27121] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS 34813] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

C-13 NMR spectroscopy in combination with the infusion of C-13-labeled precursors is currently the only technique that is capable of quantitatively studying energy metabolism, neurotransmission and other metabolic pathways non-invasively in vivo. H-1-[C-13]-NMR spectroscopy is a high-sensitivity alternative to direct C-13 NMR spectroscopy. The development of improved NMR methods for water suppression, spatial localization, broadband decoupling, shimming and signal quantification, together with the availability of high magnetic field strengths, has made H-1-[C-13]-NMR spectroscopy the method of choice for the detection of metabolism at a high spatial and/or temporal resolution. H-1-[C-13]-NMR spectroscopy can now be used to discriminate glutamatergic (excitatory) and GABAergic (inhibitory) neuronal activity. The improved sensitivity allows the detection of metabolism in different tissues (e.g. gray and white matter) and potentially even in smaller structures, like cortical layers. Finally, H-1-[C-13]-NMR spectroscopy allows the detection of energy metabolism and neurotransmission during functional activation, thereby further strengthening our understanding of the neurochemical basis of brain function. Copyright (C) 2003 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available