4.5 Article

Evaluation of single-use rotary nickel-titanium instruments

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
Volume 29, Issue 10, Pages 664-666

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00004770-200310000-00013

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study was to analyze the number and types of defects observed in single-use, rotary nickel-titanium instruments. Every ProFile Series 29.04 taper nickel-titanium instrument used during a 4-week period in an endodontic specialty practice was collected. All instruments were new and were used by experienced clinicians during a single patient visit. The instruments were routinely used in a crown-down manner with RC Prep lubrication and copious irrigation. The instruments were used in a MicroMega 324 air motor in a 6:1 gear reduction contra-angle at 333 rpm. The instruments were collected, ultrasonically cleaned, sterilized, and inspected at x 16 magnification. Torsional, flexural, and fracture defects were recorded and statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance. A total of 786 ProFile Series 29 nickel-titanium rotary instruments were evaluated; 115 (14.63%) showed some type of defect after one clinical use. Size 3 instruments had the highest defect rate (22.66%) followed by size 5 (17.30%), size 2 (17.24%), and size 4 instruments (16.10%). However, there was no statistically significant difference. The size 6 and size 7 instruments showed minimal defects (2.38% and 4.76% respectfully). Seven of 786 files had fractured (0.891%). There was no statistically significant difference in the type of failure seen within each file size. This study does show that defects can occur even with new files in the hands of experienced endodontists, and for absolute safety a single-use approach should be followed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available