4.7 Article

Variation in drought response of sal (Shorea robusta) seedlings

Journal

TREE PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 15, Pages 1021-1030

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/treephys/23.15.1021

Keywords

forest regeneration; Himalaya; India; leaf conductance; osmotic potential; seedling size; tissue elasticity; water potential; xylem conductance

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Plant development and distribution in areas with seasonal rainfall are often related to the ability of plants to postpone desiccation or tolerate low water potentials during drought. Regeneration of Shorea robusta Gaertn. (sal), a commercially valuable, widely distributed tree of the Indian tropical belt, is unsuccessful at the base of the Himalaya. Seedling shoots die back repeatedly during the long drought that follows the monsoon rain. During the course of one year, we monitored changes in plant and soil water potentials (psi), leaf conductance (g(w)), osmotic and elastic adjustment, and xylem conductance of sal seedlings of different sizes from three landforms: an alluvial plain at 540 m elevation, a slope at 510 m, and a montane site at 1370 in. Predawn plant psi and g(w) were lowest in the smallest seedlings (< 20 cm tall). Across sites and seasons, seedlings > 100 cm tall had higher morning g(w) than seedlings in the other size classes. In all size classes, plant psi was lowest during early summer, when leafing begins. Among sites, psi and g, were lowest in seedlings at the montane site. Osmotic potential was lowest during leaf development and highest during the rainy season, and tissue elasticity was highest during winter. As leaf area increased during leaf development, xylem conductance per unit of xylem cross-sectional area also increased. We conclude that low psi is unlikely to be a major cause of seedling mortality. Small seedlings, with low psi, had low leaf conductance. Adjustments of osmotic and elastic properties appear to aid responses of seedlings to drought.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available