4.8 Article

Cyclooxygenase-1 inhibition corrects endothelial dysfunction in cirrhotic rat livers

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages 515-521

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-8278(03)00347-7

Keywords

portal pressure; perfused livers; prostanoids

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/Aims: Cirrhotic livers exhibit endothelial dysfunction that contributes to the increased hepatic vascular resistance. The present study evaluates the role of cyclooxygenase (COX)-derived prostanoids, implicated in the pathogenesis of endothelial dysfunction in other settings, in the pathogenesis of endothelial dysfunction in cirrhotic livers. Methods: Endothelial dysfunction was evaluated by performing concentration-effect curves to acetylcholine after precontracting the liver with methoxamine in groups of control and CCl4-cirrhotic rat livers preincubated either with vehicle, indomethacin, the COX-1 selective inhibitor, SC-560, the COX-2 selective inhibitor, SC-236, the thromboxane A(2) receptor antagonist, SQ 29,548 or the nitric oxide (NO) synthase inhibitor N-G-nitro-L-arginine. Thromboxane A(2) (TXA(2)) production was determined in samples of the perfusate. Results: Cirrhotic livers exhibited endothelial dysfunction, as shown by the significantly lower relaxation to acetylcholine than control livers, that was totally corrected by indomethacin. COX-1 inhibition and TXA(2) blockade, but not COX-2 inhibition, also corrected endothelial dysfunction. Acetylcholine significantly increased TXA(2) production in cirrhotic but not in control livers. Indomethacin and COX-1 inhibition, but not COX-2 or NO inhibition, prevented the increased production of TXA(2). Conclusions: An increased production of TXA(2) is involved in the pathogenesis of endothelial dysfunction in cirrhotic rat livers. This is mainly mediated by COX-1, but not by COX-2. (C) 2003 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available