4.6 Review

Molecular genetics of Xeroderma pigmentosum variant

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages 529-536

Publisher

BLACKWELL MUNKSGAARD
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0625.2003.00124.x

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) is an autosomal recessive disease characterized by sun sensitivity, early onset of freckling and subsequent neoplastic changes on sun-exposed skin. Skin abnormalities result from an inability to repair UV-damaged DNA because of defects in the nucleotide excision repair (NER) machinery. Xeroderma pigmentosum is genetically heterogeneous and is classified into seven complementation groups (XPA-XPG) that correspond to genetic alterations in one of seven genes involved in NER. The variant type of XP (XPV), first described in 1970 by Ernst G. Jung as 'pigmented xerodermoid', is caused by defects in the post replication repair machinery while NER is not impaired. Identification of the XPV gene was only achieved in 1999 by biochemical purification and sequencing of a protein from HeLa cell extracts complementing the PRR defect in XPV cells. The XPV protein, polymerase (pol) eta, represents a novel member of the Y family of bypass DNA polymerases that facilitate DNA translesion synthesis. The major function of poleta is to allow DNA translesion synthesis of UV-induced TT-dimers in an error-free manner; it also possesses the capability to bypass other DNA lesions in an error-prone manner. Xeroderma pigmentosum V is caused by molecular alterations in the POLH gene, located on chromosome 6p21.1-6p12. Affected individuals are homozygous or compound heterozygous for a spectrum of genetic lesions, including nonsense mutations, deletions or insertions, confirming the autosomal recessive nature of the condition. Identification of POLH as the XPV gene provides an important instrument for improving molecular diagnostics in XPV families.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available