4.2 Article

Re-evaluation of the RBE of 29 kV x-rays (mammography x-rays) relative to 220 kV x-rays using neoplastic transformation of human CGL1-hybrid cells

Journal

RADIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOPHYSICS
Volume 42, Issue 3, Pages 175-182

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00411-003-0210-y

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neoplastic transformation of human CGL1-hybrid cells was examined after exposure to 29 kV x-rays (mammography x-rays) and conventional 220 kV x-rays. The study was designed to repeat, under well-defined irradiation and culture conditions, an earlier investigation by Frankenberg et al. (Radiat Res, 2002), and to assess the validity of the high RBE values of 29 kV x-rays that had been reported. The experiments with the two types of x-rays were performed simultaneously and shared the same controls. The transformation yields with both radiation qualities were fitted to the linear-quadratic dependence on absorbed dose, and a corresponding analysis was performed for the data earlier obtained by Frankenberg et al. The transformation yields in the present study exceed those in the earlier investigation substantially, and it appears that the difference reflects inadequate feeding conditions of the cell cultures in the early experiments. The standard error bands of the dose response curves are derived and are seen to be considerably more narrow in the present results. The lowest dose of the 29 kV x-rays was 1 Gy in both studies, and at this dose the RBE vs. the conventional x-rays has now been found to be 2 with a 95% confidence interval of 1.4-2.6. The previous result was about 3.2, but the 95% confidence is very broad for these data. The estimated limit at low doses is 3.4 in the present experiments with a confidence interval that extends from less than 2 to large values.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available