4.6 Article

Behavioral responses are altered in piglets with decreased frontal cortex docosahexaenoic acid

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
Volume 133, Issue 10, Pages 3222-3227

Publisher

AMER INST NUTRITION
DOI: 10.1093/jn/133.10.3222

Keywords

docosahexaenoic acid; brain; behavior; doparnine; piglets; dietary fatty acids

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Docosahexaenoic acid [22:6(n-3)] is required in large amounts for membrane lipid synthesis during brain growth. The functional importance of differences in dietary fatty acid intakes that alter brain 22:6(n-3), however, is not well understood. We used a dietary approach to manipulate 22:6(n-3) in piglet brain and assessed the effects on behavior and change in behavior on an elevated plus maze after administration of L-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-Dopa) or sulperide, a dopamine D2 receptor blocker. Piglets were fed 1.2% energy 18:2(n-6) and 0.05% energy 18:3(n-3) (low PUFA), or 10.7% energy 18:2(n-6), 1.1% energy 18:3(n-3), 0.3% energy 20:4(n-6) and 0.3% energy 22:6(n-3) (high PUFA) from 1 d of age and behavior assessed at 18-22 d of age. At 30 d of age, frontal cortex dopamine, and phosphatidylcholine (PC), phosphatidylserine (PS), phosphatidyethanolamine (PE) and phosphatidylinositol (PI) fatty acids were quantified. Piglets fed the low PUFA diet had fewer arm entries on the maze than piglets fed the high PUFA diet, P = 0.02. L-Dopa increased the open (P = 0.005) and closed (P = 0.04) arm entries by piglets fed the low PUFA diet. Behavior did not differ between piglets fed the low and high PUFA diets when given L-Dopa. Frontal cortex PC, PS and PE 22:6(n-3) was lower and 22:5(n-6) was higher in piglets fed the low compared with the high PUFA diet, P < 0.01. Our work establishes the neonatal piglet as a model with which to study the behavioral effects of diet-induced changes in brain 22:6(n-3), and provides functional evidence that brain 22:6(n-3) is important in central dopamine metabolism.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available