4.7 Article

Assessment of the ozone sensitivity of 22 native plant species from Mediterranean annual pastures based on visible injury

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
Volume 37, Issue 33, Pages 4667-4677

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.07.002

Keywords

grasslands; dehesa; clover; critical levels; foliar damage

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ozone (O-3) phytototoxicity has been reported on a wide range of plant species, inducing the appearance of specific foliar injury or increasing leaf senescence. No information regarding the sensitivity of plant species from dehesa Mediterranean grasslands has been provided in spite of their great biological diversity. A screening study was carried out in open-top chambers (OTCs) to assess the O-3-sensitivity of 22 representative therophytes of these ecosystems based on the appearance and extent of foliar injury. A distinction was made between specific O-3 injury and non-specific discolorations. Three O-3 treatments (charcoal-filtered air, non-filtered air and non-filtered air supplemented with 40 nl l(-1) O-3 during 5 days per week) and three OTCs per treatment were used. The Papilionaceae species were more sensitive to O-3 than the Poaceae species involved in the experiment since ambient levels induced foliar symptoms in 67% and 27%, respectively, of both plant families. An O-3-sensitivity ranking of the species involved in the assessment is provided, which could be useful for bioindication programmes in Mediterranean areas. The assessed Trifolium species were particularly sensitive since foliar symptoms were apparent in association with O-3 accumulated exposures well below the current critical level for the prevention of this kind of effect. The exposure indices involving lower cut-off values (i.e. 30 nl l(-1)) were best related with the extent Of O-3-induced injury on these species. (C) 2003 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available