4.2 Article

Differential distribution of NK cells in decidua basalis compared with decidua parietalis after uncomplicated human term pregnancy

Journal

HUMAN IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 64, Issue 10, Pages 921-929

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0198-8859(03)00170-8

Keywords

decidua basalis; decidua parietalis; NK cells; maternal-fetal interface; immunology of term pregnancy

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As pregnancy progresses, a characteristic decline in the percentage of CD56(bright) CD16(-) uterine natural killer (NK) cells occurs. Studies of term decidua, however, have focused only on leukocytes derived from decidua basalis, the site of implantation. The decidua parietalis, lining the remainder of the uterine cavity is another important region of the maternal-fetal interface that forms contact with fetal tissue at the end of the first trimester. The aim of this study was to evaluate possible differences in expression of CD16 and CD56 on leukocytes from normal term decidua basalis and decidua parietalis. Decidua basalis and parietalis samples were obtained from 30 placentas collected after elective cesarean section. Percentages of leukocyte subpopulations and NK cell subsets within the CD45(+) cell fraction were determined by flow cytometry. In six decidual samples, concurrent immunohistochemical staining was performed. Higher percentages of CD56(dim) CD16(+) NK cells and CD56(-) CD16(+) cells were found in decidua basalis in comparison to decidua parietalis. In contrast, the percentage of CD56(bright) CD16(-) uterine NK cells was significantly higher in decidua parietalis. Immunohistochemical quantification supported flow cytometric results. We conclude that significant differences exist with respect to the distribution of NK cells in term decidua basalis and parietalis. Future functional studies may improve our understanding of their role at the maternal-fetal interface. (C) American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics, 2003. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available