4.7 Article

Kinetics of recovery of leaf hydraulic conductance and vein functionality from cavitation-induced embolism in sunflower

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
Volume 54, Issue 391, Pages 2323-2330

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erg259

Keywords

Helianthus annuus; hydraulic conductance; leaf; refilling; sunflower; vein embolism; xylem pressure

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The kinetics of leaf vein recovery from cavitation-induced embolism was studied in plants of sunflower cv. Margot, together with the impact of vein embolism on the overall leaf hydraulic conductance (K-leaf). During the air-dehydration of leaves to leaf water potentials (Psi(L)) of -1.25 MPa, K-leaf was found to decrease by about 46% with respect to values recorded in well-hydrated leaves. When leaves, previously dehydrated to Psi(L)= -1.1 MPa (corresponding to the turgor loss point), were put in contact with water, K-leaf recovered completely in 10 min and so did leaf water potential. Functional vein density was estimated in both dehydrating and rehydrating leaves in terms of total length of red-stained veins infiltrated with a Phloxine B solution per unit leaf surface area. Veins were found to embolize (unstained) with kinetics showing a linear relationship with K-leaf so that about a 70% loss of functional veins corresponded with a K-leaf loss of 46%. Cavitated veins recovered from embolism within 10 min from the beginning of leaf rehydration. These data indicate that: (a) leaves of sunflower underwent substiantial vein embolism during dehydration; (b) vein embolism and leaf hydraulic efficiency apparently recovered from dehydration completely and rapidly upon rehydration; (c) vein refilling occurred while conduits were still at more negative xylem pressures than those required for spontaneous bubble dissolution on the basis of Henry's law. The possible consistent contribution of vital mechanisms for vein refilling is discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available