4.3 Article

A new enzymatic method for the detachment of particle associated soil bacteria

Journal

JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages 201-211

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-7012(03)00144-1

Keywords

enzymatic detachment; extracellular polymeric substances (EPS); lectins; polysaccharides; soil bacteria; total cell counts

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new enzymatic technique for the detachment of bacteria from soil particles was developed and applied to different soil samples taken at various sampling sites and depths. Many soil microorganisms are closely associated with the organic matrix of soil particles. They produce extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), which promote the irreversible adhesion of cells to soil particulates. To characterize the EPS, a prestaining of the soil samples with different lectins was performed. Samples from a sewage field, an urban park, a farmland, a mixed forest and garden mold were stained with a set of FITC-labelled lectins from Triticum vulgaris, Ulex europacus, Concanavalin A and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Based on the results, a combination of alpha-glucosidase, beta-galactosidase and a lipase was chosen for degradation of the EPS structures, followed by gentle mechanical and chemical dispersion in a modified sodium pyrophosphate buffer. The samples were fixed with formaldehyde and total cell counts were determined by DAPI staining. With the exception of the wheat field sample, this technique revealed up to 22-fold higher total cell counts for all investigated soil samples compared to the conventional detachment method, a simple dispersion with sodium pyrophosphate buffer. Efficiency of the technique was assessed by scanning electron microscopy. These images showed convincingly that the enzymatic treatment followed by sonication efficiently detached the bacteria and left the soil particles almost blank. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available