4.6 Article

Absorption of light by soot particles: determination of the absorption coefficient by means of aethalometers

Journal

JOURNAL OF AEROSOL SCIENCE
Volume 34, Issue 10, Pages 1445-1463

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0021-8502(03)00359-8

Keywords

absorption coefficient; black carbon; light attenuation; aethalometer calibration; multiple scattering; single scattering albedo

Ask authors/readers for more resources

During a soot aerosol measurement campaign the response of two different aethalometers (AE10 with white light and AE30 with multiwavelength capability) to several types of soot was investigated. Diesel soot, spark-generated carbon particles, and mixtures of these soot particles with ammonium sulfate and oxidation products of alpha-pinene were used in this evaluation. The determination of the particles light absorption coefficient (b(abs)) with the AE10 aethalometer is a difficult task because of an ill-defined spectral sensitivity of this instrument. Provided that the proper numerical corrections are performed, the AE30 instrument allows for the measurement of b(abs) over a wide spectral range (lambda = 450-950 nm). During all experiments it was found that with increasing filter load the optical path in the aethalometer filter decreased. As a result, an increased underestimation of the measured aethalometer signals (b(abs) or black carbon mass concentrations) occurs with increasing filter loads. This effect, which is attributed to a shadowing of the particles in the fiber matrix, is very pronounced for pure soot particles while almost negligible for aged atmospheric aerosols. An empirical correction for this bias is presented and requires information on the light scattering behavior (i.e. light scattering coefficient) of the sampled particles. Without this additional information, the applicability of the instruments is limited. Comparison with a reference method shows that multiple scattering in the nearly unloaded fiber filter is responsible for enhanced light absorption by a factor of about 2.14. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available