4.8 Article

Antifouling blood purification membrane composed of cellulose acetate and phospholipid polymer

Journal

BIOMATERIALS
Volume 24, Issue 23, Pages 4143-4152

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00296-5

Keywords

cellulose acetate membrane; MPC copolymer; blood purification; permeability; hemocompatibility; membrane fouling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ideal surface of an artificial blood purification membrane needs hemocompatibility and durability of high performance; it should not adsorb any proteins or cells but should still have high permeability in the desired range of solute size. To improve the anti-fouling property of cellulose acetate (CA) membranes, a CA membrane blended with poly(2-methaeryloyloxyethyl phosphorvicholine (MPC)-co-n-butyl methacrylate (BMA)) (PMB30) was designed as a blood purification membrane. The polymer solutions for preparing the membrane were prepared using a solvent mixture composed of N, N-dimethylformamide, acetone, 2-propanol or water. The CA and CA/PMB30 blend membranes with an asymmetric and porous structure were prepared by a phase inversion process. The characteristics of the CA/PMB30 blend membrane, such as structural properties, mechanical properties, and solute permeability were examined with attention to changes in the preparation conditions of the membrane. The CA/PMB30 blend membrane had good water and solute permeability and a sharp molecular weight cut-off property. Moreover, the amount of proteins adsorbed on the CA/PMB30 blend membrane surface was less than that of the original CA membrane and a conventional polysulfone membrane. Adhesion and activation of platelets on the CA/PMB30 blend membrane were reduced compared with that on a CA membrane. In addition, the CA/PMB30 blend membrane showed good permselectivity and an antifouling property during a long time ultrafiltration experiment with protein solutions. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available