3.8 Article

Expression of estrogen receptor α (ERα) in the rat temporomandibular joint

Publisher

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/ar.a.10107

Keywords

estrogen receptor alpha; temporomandibular joint; synovial membrane; immunocytochemistry; in situ hybridization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Numerous epidemiological studies have pointed out a higher frequency of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) in women than in men, which indicates the involvement of a sex hormone, such as estrogen, in the pathogenesis of TMD. Although estrogen is known to play pivotal roles in osteoarthrosis or rheumatoid arthritis in systemic joints, there have been few reports about the role of estrogen in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). The effect of estrogen is generally mediated by the estrogen receptors (ERs) ERalpha (the predominant type) and ERbeta. In this study we examined the expression of ERalpha protein and mRNA in the TMJ of adult male rats by immunocytochemistry and in situ hybridization histochemistry. Intense ERalpha immunoreactivity was localized in the synovial lining cells, stromal cells in the articular disc, and chondrocytes in the TMJ. These ERalpha-immunopositive synovial lining cells are characteristic of cytoplasmic processes identified with confocal and immunoelectron microscopy, which indicates that they are synovial type B cells. In situ hybridization histochemistry confirmed intense signals for ERalpha in the synovial lining cells and the sublining fibroblasts at mRNA levels. The nuclei of chondrocytes showed an intense immunoreaction for ERalpha in the maturative and hypertrophic layers of the articular cartilage. In addition to the nuclear localization of ERalpha, a weak immunoreaction appeared in the cytoplasm of some ERalpha-positive cells. These findings support the hypothesis that TMJ tissue-at least in the male rat-has the potential to be an estrogen target tissue. (C) 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available