4.0 Article

Acute Selenium Toxicity Associated With a Dietary Supplement

Journal

ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 170, Issue 3, Pages 256-261

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.495

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [DK058763]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Selenium is an element necessary for normal cellular function, but it can have toxic effects at high doses. We investigated an outbreak of acute selenium poisoning. Methods: A case was defined as the onset of symptoms of selenium toxicity in a person within 2 weeks after ingesting a dietary supplement manufactured by Company A, purchased after January 1, 2008. We conducted case finding, administered initial and 90-day follow-up questionnaires to affected persons, and obtained laboratory data where available. Results: The source of the outbreak was identified as a liquid dietary supplement that contained 200 times the labeled concentration of selenium. Of 201 cases identified in 10 states, 1 person was hospitalized. The median estimated dose of selenium consumed was 41749 mu g/d (recommended dietary allowance is 55 mu g/d). Frequently reported symptoms included diarrhea (78%), fatigue (75%), hair loss (72%), joint pain (70%), nail discoloration or brittleness (61%), and nausea (58%). Symptoms persisting 90 days or longer included fingernail discoloration and loss (52%), fatigue (35%), and hair loss (29%). The mean initial serum selenium concentration of 8 patients was 751 mu g/L (reference range, <= 125 mu g/L). The mean initial urine selenium concentration of 7 patients was 166 mu g/24h (reference range, <= 55 mu g/24 h). Conclusions: Toxic concentrations of selenium in a liquid dietary supplement resulted in a widespread outbreak. Had the manufacturers been held to standards used in the pharmaceutical industry, it may have been prevented.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available