4.0 Article

Medical Home Capabilities of Primary Care Practices That Serve Sociodemographically Vulnerable Neighborhoods

Journal

ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 170, Issue 11, Pages 938-945

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.110

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Commonwealth Fund
  2. Health Resources and Services Administration [5 T32 HP11001 20]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Under current medical home proposals, primary care practices using specific structural capabilities will receive enhanced payments. Some practices disproportionately serve sociodemographically vulnerable neighborhoods. If these practices lack medical home capabilities, their ineligibility for enhanced payments could worsen disparities in care. Methods: Via survey, 308 Massachusetts primary care practices reported their use of 13 structural capabilities commonly included in medical home proposals. Using geocoded US Census data, we constructed racial/ethnic minority and economic disadvantage indices to describe the neighborhood served by each practice. We compared the structural capabilities of disproportionate-share practices (those in the most sociodemographically vulnerable quintile on each index) and others. Results: Racial/ethnic disproportionate-share practices were more likely than others to have staff assisting patient self-management (69% vs 55%; P=.003), on-site language interpreters (54% vs 26%; P<.001), multilingual clinicians (80% vs 51%; P<.001), and multifunctional electronic health records (48% vs 29%; P=.01). Similarly, economic disproportionate-share practices were more likely than others to have physician awareness of patient experience ratings (73% vs 65%; P=.03), on-site language interpreters (56% vs 25%; P<.001), multilingual clinicians (78% vs 51%; P <.001), and multifunctional electronic health records (40% vs 31%; P=.03). Disproportionate-share practices were larger than others. After adjustment for practice size, only language capabilities continued to have statistically significant relationships with disproportionate-share status. Conclusions: Contrary to expectations, primary care practices serving sociodemographically vulnerable neighborhoods were more likely than other practices to have structural capabilities commonly included in medical home proposals. Payments tied to these capabilities may aid practices serving vulnerable populations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available