4.6 Article

Circulating endothelial cells in pulmonary hypertension

Journal

THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages 698-703

Publisher

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1160/TH03-04-0251

Keywords

circulating endothelial cells; plexiform lesion; angiogenesis; primary pulmonary hypertension

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [5PO1 HLGB254-02, P01 HL055552] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The pulmonary endothelium plays a significant role in the pathobiology of Primary Pulmonary Hypertension. A number of diseases, related by a history of vascular injury, are associated with increased numbers of circulating endothelial cells (CECs). We hypothesized that patients with pulmonary hypertension would also have an increased number of circulating endothelial cells due to the high pressures and increased shear stress present within the pulmonary vasculature. We isolated the CECs from 14 patients with pulmonary hypertension, (5 primary and I I secondary) and compared them to the cells from 12 normal controls. There was a significant increase in the number of CECs in peripheral blood in patients with both PPH and secondary pulmonary hypertension (SPH) when compared to normal volunteers (33.1 +/- 1.9 {PPH} and 27.2 +/- 6.9 {SPH} vs. 3.5 +/- 1.3 {controls}, p < 0.001). The number of circulating endothelial cells in the patient's peripheral blood correlated significantly with the systolic, diastolic and mean pulmonary artery pressures of the individual. Approximately 50% of the CECs from patients with pulmonary hypertension expressed CD36, a marker of microvascular origin and 25% expressed E-selectin, a marker of endothelial cell activation. Although the origin of the CECs in patients with PH requires further investigation, one possible source is the pulmonary vasculature, and in patients with plexogenic pulmonary hypertension, the plexiform lesions. CECs may provide a non-invasive mean of accessing cells important to the pathobiology of severe pulmonary hypertension.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available