4.4 Article

Cooking attenuates the ability of high-amylose meals to reduce plasma insulin concentrations in rats

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages 823-827

Publisher

C A B I PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1079/BJN2003958

Keywords

amylose; amylopectin; cooking; insulin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Postprandial glycaemic control is important in the prevention and therapy of type 2 diabetes and related diseases. Agents that may reduce postprandial glycaemia and/or insulinaemia, such as consumption of high-amylose foods, are considered beneficial; however, little is known about the dose-response relationship and the effects of cooking. The aim of the present study was to define the dose-response curve for postprandial glycaemic and insulinaemic excursions following meals of different amylose content and to compare the dose-response curves for meals containing cooked and uncooked starches. Following an overnight fast, rats ingested a test meal and blood was sampled over 2 It. The meal was given at 1.0 g carbohydrate/kg body weight, with an amylose content of 0, 270, 600 or 850 g/kg total starch. The area under the glucose curve did not differ under any condition investigated. For the uncooked-starch diets, area under the insulin curve was higher for the 0 g amylose/kg total starch meal than all other meals (P=0.0001). For the cooked-starch diets, area under the insulin curve was higher in the 0 than the 600 and 850 g amylose/kg total starch groups (P<0.01), but did not differ from the 270 amylose/kg total starch group. These results suggest that even a relatively small proportion of uncooked amylose (270 g/kg total starch) is sufficient to achieve a maximal attenuating effect on postprandial insulin concentrations as compared with 0 g amylose/kg total starch. Following cooking, however, a much higher proportion of amylose (greater than or equal to600 g/kg total starch) is needed to achieve a similar effect.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available