4.7 Article

Fas ligand mediates immune privilege and not inflammation in human colon cancer, irrespective of TGF-β expression

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 89, Issue 7, Pages 1345-1351

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601240

Keywords

fas ligand; immune privilege; neutrophils; transforming growth factor-beta; apoptosis

Categories

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many cancers express Fas ligand (FasL/CD95L) in vivo, and can kill lymphoid cells by Fas-mediated apoptosis in vitro. However, overexpression of recombinant FasL in murine tumour allografts revealed a potential antitumour effect of FasL, via recruitment of neutrophils. Transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1) could inhibit these neutrophil-stimulatory effects of FasL. In the present study, we sought to determine directly whether FasL contributes to immune privilege or tumour rejection in human colon cancers in vivo, and whether TGF-beta1 regulates FasL function. Serial tumour sections were immunostained for FasL and TGF-beta1. Neutrophils and tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were detected by immunohistochemistry for lactoferrin and CD45, respectively. Apoptotic TIL were identified by dual staining for TUNEL/CD45. FasL expression by nests of tumour cells was associated with a mean four-fold depletion of TILs (range 1.8-33-fold, n=16, P<0.001), together with a two-fold increase in TIL apoptosis (range 1.6-2.5-fold, n=14, P<0.001), relative to FasL-negative nests within the same tumours. The overall level of neutrophils present in all tumours examined was low (mean 0.3%, n=16), with FasL expression by tumour nests associated with a mean two-fold decrease in neutrophils, irrespective of TGF-beta1 expression. Together, our results suggest that tumour-expressed FasL is inhibitory rather than stimulatory towards antitumour immune responses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available