4.7 Article

Virial shocks in galactic haloes?

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 345, Issue 1, Pages 349-364

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06955.x

Keywords

hydrodynamics; shock waves; cooling flows; galaxies : formation; galaxies : ISM; dark matter

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigate the conditions for the existence of an expanding virial shock in the gas falling within a spherical dark matter halo. The shock relies on pressure support by the shock-heated gas behind it. When the radiative cooling is efficient compared with the infall rate, the postshock gas becomes unstable; it collapses inwards and cannot support the shock. We find for a monatomic gas that the shock is stable when the post-shock pressure and density obey gamma(eff) = (d ln P dt) (d ln rho/dt) > 10/7. When expressed in terms of the pre-shock gas properties at radius r it reads as rhor Lambda (T)/u(3) < 0.0126, where ρ is the gas density, u is the infall velocity and Λ(T) is the cooling function, with the post-shock temperature T ∝ u(2). This result is confirmed by hydrodynamical simulations, using an accurate spheri-symmetric Lagrangian code. When the stability analysis is applied in cosmology, we find that a virial shock does not develop in most haloes that form before z ∼ 2, and it never forms in haloes less massive than a few 10(11) M-.. In such haloes, the infalling gas is not heated to the virial temperature until it hits the disc, thus avoiding the cooling-dominated quasi-static contraction phase. The direct collapse of the cold gas into the disc should have non-trivial effects on the star formation rate and on outflows. The soft X-ray produced by the shock-heated gas in the disc is expected to ionize the dense disc environment, and the subsequent recombination would result in a high flux of Lα emission. This may explain both the puzzling low flux of soft X-ray background and the Lα emitters observed at high redshift.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available