4.4 Article

Structural competition involving G-quadruplex DNA and its complement

Journal

BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 42, Issue 40, Pages 11736-11744

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi034168j

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Structural competition between the G-quadruplex, the I-motif, and the Watson-Crick duplex has been implicated for repetitive DNA sequences, but the competitive mechanism of these multistranded structures still needs to be elucidated. We investigated the effects of sequence context, cation species, and pH on duplex formation by the G-quadruplex of dG(3)(T(2)AG(3))(3) and its complement the I-motif of d(C(3)TA(2))(3)C-3, using ITC, DSC, PAGE, CD, UV, and CD stopped-flow kinetic techniques. ITC and PAGE experiments confirmed Watson-Crick duplex formation by the complementary strands. The binding constant of the two DNA strands in the presence of 10 mM Mg2+ at pH 7.0 was shown to be 5.28 x 10(7) M-1 at 20 degreesC, about 400 times larger than that in the presence of 100 mM Na+ at pH 5.5. The dynamic transition traces of the duplex formation from the equimolar mixture of G-/C-rich complementary sequences were obtained at both pH 7.0 and pH 5.5. Fitting to a single-exponential function gave an observed rate of 8.06 x 10(-3) s(-1) at 20 degreesC in 10 mM Mg2+ buffer at pH 7.0, which was about 10 times the observed rate at pH 5.5 under the same conditions. Both of the observed rates increased as temperature rose, implying that the dissociation of the single-stranded structured DNAs is the rate-limiting step for the WC duplex formation. The difference between the apparent activation energy at pH 7.0 and that at pH 5.5 reflects the fact that pH significantly influences the structural competition between the G-quadruplex, the I-motif, and the Watson-Crick duplex, which also implies a possible biological role for I-motifs in biological regulation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available