4.7 Article

The elderly: Health status benefits and recovery of function one year after coronary artery bypass surgery

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 42, Issue 8, Pages 1421-1426

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(03)01052-0

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to describe the health status (symptoms, function, and quality of fife) changes of elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and compare these to younger patients. BACKGROUND Despite increasing use of CABG in the elderly, few data exist about elderly patients' health status benefits from CABG. METHODS A total of 690 consecutive patients (n = 156, >75 years of age; n = 534, less than or equal to75 years of age) from a single center were administered the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) at baseline and at one year. The first 224 patients were also given monthly questionnaires for six months after CABG. RESULTS Although peri-operative mortality was similar (2.6% vs. 2.2%, p = NS), one-year mortality was greater in older patients (11.5% vs. 5.4%, p = 0.008). Among survivors, similar health status benefits were observed one year after surgery (SAQ change scores for Physical Function 21.5 +/- 27.0 vs. 19.7 +/- 27.0, p = 0.67; Angina Frequency 30.1 +/- 25.7 vs. 24.6 +/- 25.6, p = 0.07; and Quality of Life 37.7 +/- 21.8 vs. 33.6 +/- 25.2, p = 0.16). In 224 patients assessed monthly, elderly patients' physical function scores were significantly lower than the younger group until one year. The age-time interaction term was significant (p = 0.003), confirming a slower recovery of physical function. In contrast, angina relief and quality of life improvement did not differ by age. CONCLUSIONS Despite a slower rate of physical recovery, older patients derived similar health status benefits from CABG compared with younger patients. These data should assist physicians in counseling elderly patients and suggest that age alone should not be a deterrent for recommending bypass surgery. (C) 2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available