4.6 Article

Hydrological regime analysis of the Selenge River basin, Mongolia

Journal

HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES
Volume 17, Issue 14, Pages 2929-2945

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.1442

Keywords

semi-arid area; hydrological model; water budget component; Selenge River basin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Arid and semi-arid regions are very vulnerable to environmental changes. Climate change studies indicate that the environment in such areas will steadily deteriorate with global warming; inland lakes will shrink and desert areas will expand. Mongolia is a landlocked country in north-central Asia that contains a unique ecological system consisting of taiga, steppe, and desert from north to south. The Selenge River basin (280000 km(2)) in northern Mongolia is a semi-arid region underlain by permafrost, between latitudes 46 and 52degreesN, and longitudes 96 and 109degreesE. The issue of sustainable development of the basin is very important owing to its limited natural resources, including fresh water, forest, and rangeland. To examine the water cycle processes in the basin, a hydrological analysis was carried out using a simple scheme for the interaction between the land surface and atmosphere (big-leaf model) coupled to a hydrological model for the period 1988-92 to estimate the hydrological regime of the basin. Annual precipitation in this period averaged 298 mm, ranging from 212 to 352 mm at a 1degrees x 1degrees resolution based on data from 10 gauges, and the estimated annual evapotranspiration averaged 241 turn, ranging between 153 and 300 mm. This indicates that evapotranspiration accounts for the overwhelming majority of the annual precipitation, averaging 81% and ranging between 64 and 96%. The annual potential evapotranspiration in the basin averaged 2009 mm; the ratio of evapotranspiration (actual to potential evapotranspiration) was 0.12 and the wetness index (annual precipitation to potential evapotranspiration) was 0.15. Copyright (C) 2003 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available