4.6 Article

Head-only exposure to GSM 900-MHz electromagnetic fields does not alter rat's memory in spatial and non-spatial tasks

Journal

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 145, Issue 1-2, Pages 51-61

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0166-4328(03)00100-1

Keywords

EMF; learning; radial-arm maze; object recognition; rat; mobile phone

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Over the last decade, exposure to high frequency (2450 MHz) electromagnetic fields (EMFs) has been found to induce performance deficit in rodents in spatial memory tasks. As concern was expressed about potential biological effects of mobile communication microwaves, studies testing the effects of signals such as GSM were required. In a previous study, using head-only exposure to 900 MHz GSM EMF, we could not demonstrate any behavioural deficit in two simple learning tasks. The present study aimed at extending these results with more complex spatial learning tasks and a non-spatial task. In a first experiment, rats were trained in a radial-arm maze with a 10-s confinement between each visited arm. In a second experiment, a 15-min intra-trial delay was introduced after four visited arms. In a third experiment, non-spatial memory was tested in an object recognition task. In all experiments, performance of the head-only exposed rats (1 and 3.5 W/kg) was compared with that of sham and control rats. In the first experiment, a slightly improved performance was found after 3.5 W/kg exposure, a result that was not observed in the delay-task. In the third experiment, although some effects on exploratory activity were found, recognition memory was unaffected in exposed rats. Altogether, this set of experiments provides no evidence indicating that spatial and non-spatial memory can be affected by a 45-min head-only exposure to 900 MHz GSM EMF. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available