4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Diet factors responsible for the change of the glucose oxidase activity in labial salivary glands of Helicoverpa armigera

Journal

ARCHIVES OF INSECT BIOCHEMISTRY AND PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 68, Issue 2, Pages 113-121

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/arch.20240

Keywords

glucose oxidase; Helicoverpa armigera; sugar; phenolics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated the change of the glucose oxidase (GOX) activity in labial salivary glands of Helicoverpa armigera larvae fed with the artificial diet or host plant tobacco and the major factors responsible for such a change. Throughout larval development, the labial salivary GOX activities in caterpillars reared on the artificial diet were remarkably higher than those fed with the plant. After fifth-instar plant-fed caterpillars were transferred to the artificial diet, their labial salivary GOX activity increased quickly, which was closely correlated with the time spent feeding on the artificial diet. The total sugar content of the artificial diet was 68 times higher than that of the tobacco leaves. We hypothesized that sugars and secondary metabolites are the possible causes of induction of GOX activity. When fifth-instar caterpillars were fed with tobacco leaves coated with glucose or sucrose, their labial salivary GOX activity was significantly higher than those fed with leaves without sugar coating. Following native PAGE, I single bond of the labial salivary GOX was observed in all the caterpillars fed with different diets, implying that only the activity of the isoenzyme was changed in response to different diets. Furthermore, the labial salivary GOX activity was determined after caterpillars were fed with artificial diets containing chlorogenic acid, rutin, and quercetin. The results showed that all these phenolic compounds had no effect on the GOX activity. We conclude that sugar in diets was a major factor influencing the labial salivary GOX activity of the larvae.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available