3.9 Article

Evaluation of non-culture diagnosis of invasive meningococcal disease by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

Journal

FEMS IMMUNOLOGY AND MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages 31-36

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0928-8244(03)00175-5

Keywords

polymerase chain reaction; meningococcal disease; Neisseria meningitidis; diagnosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Antibiotic treatment prior to transport or admission to hospital has reduced the proportion of cases of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) from which Neisseria meningitidis can be isolated by standard microbiological techniques. Identification of meningococci by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was assessed in relation to microbiological diagnosis for cases over a 4-year period between 1998 and 2001. A screening assay for the IS1106 gene was used to detect meningococcal DNA and five additional assays for siaD and orf-2 genes were performed to determine the serogroup. PCR results were compared with results of bacteriological culture, other laboratory test results and clinical data. The sensitivity of the PCR assay for culture-confirmed cases was 98.5%. The specificity of the assay was 96% based on test results for patients from whom other bacteria were isolated, children with viral meningitis and afebrile negative controls. The siaD B/C/W-135 and Y as well as the orf-2 gene for serogroup A PCR assays were able to determine the serogroup for 75.2% of cases that were positive by PCR screening assay. When isolates from patients with IMD were tested by both agglutination and PCR, the results agreed in all cases. PCR is a useful tool for diagnosis of IMD when Gram stain and culture tests are negative due to antibiotic treatment prior to collection of samples for microbiological analyses. (C) 2003 Federation of European Microbiological Societies. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available