4.6 Article

Pulmonary surfactant disaturated phosphatidylcholine (DSPC) turnover and pool size in newborn infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH)

Journal

PEDIATRIC RESEARCH
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages 653-658

Publisher

INT PEDIATRIC RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INC
DOI: 10.1203/01.PDR.0000084344.42409.C6

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In animal CDH models, surfactant deficiency contributes to the pathophysiology of the condition but information on human disease is very limited. The aim of our study was to investigate surfactant kinetics in CDH newborns. We studied surfactant disaturated-phosphatidylcholine (DSPC) half-life, turnover and apparent pool size by stable isotope methodology in CDH newborns with no ExtraCorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) support (n = 13, birth weight (BW) 3.2 +/- 2.2 kg, gestational age (GA) 39 +/- 0.4 wks, postnatal age 43 +/- 11 h) and in 8 term infants with no lung disease (CONTROLS, BW 2.7 +/- 0 kg, GA 38 +/- 0.8 wks, postnatal age 96 +/- 26 h). We administered a trace dose of C-13-palmitic acid dipalmitoyl-phosphatidylcholine (DPPC) through the endotracheal (ET) tube and we measured DSPC kinetics by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry from (DSPCC)-C-13-enrichment decay curves obtained from sequential tracheal aspirates. DSPC amount from tracheal aspirates (TA-DSPC) was measured by gas chromatography. In CDH infants DSPC half-life was shorter (24 +/- 4 and 53 +/- 11 h, p = 0.01), turnover faster (0.6 +/- 0.1 and 1.5 +/- 0.3 d(-1) p = 0.01), apparent pool size smaller (34 +/- 6 and 57 +/- 7 mg/kg body weight, p = 0.02) and tracheal aspirates DSPC amount lower (2.4 +/- 0.4 and 4.6 +/- 0.5 mg/mL Epithelial Lining Fluid (ELF), p = 0.007) than in CONTROLS. In conclusion surfactant kinetics is grossly abnormal in mechanically ventilated CDH. Whether alterations of DSPC kinetics in CDH infants are caused by a primary surfactant deficiency or are secondary to oxygen therapy and ventilator support has still to be determined.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available