4.6 Article

Further validation of a new methodology for surface moisture and vegetation optical depth retrieval

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING
Volume 24, Issue 22, Pages 4559-4578

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/0143116031000095934

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A series of validation studies for a recently developed soil moisture and optical depth retrieval algorithm is presented. The approach is largely theoretical, and uses a non-linear iterative optimization procedure to solve a simple radiative transfer equation for the two parameters from dual polarization satellite microwave brightness temperatures. The satellite retrievals were derived from night-time 6.6 GHz Nimbus Scanning Multichannel Microwave Radiometer (SMMR) observations, and were compared to soil moisture data sets from the USA, Mongolia, Turkmenistan and Russia. The surface temperature, which is also an unknown parameter in the model, is derived off-line from 37 GHz vertical polarized brightness temperatures. The new theoretical approach is independent of field observations of soil moisture or canopy biophysical measurements and can be used at any wavelength in the microwave region. The soil moisture retrievals compared well with the surface moisture observations from the various locations. The vegetation optical depth also compared well to time series of Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and showed similar seasonal patterns. From a global perspective, the satellite-derived surface soil moisture was consistent with expected spatial patterns, identifying both known dry areas such as deserts and semi-arid areas and moist agricultural areas very well. Spatial patterns of vegetation optical depth were found to be in agreement with NDVI. The methodology described in this study should be directly transferable to the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR) on the recently launched AQUA satellite.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available