4.5 Article

Sex differences in serotonergic activity in dorsal and median raphe nucleus

Journal

PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR
Volume 80, Issue 2-3, Pages 203-210

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2003.07.012

Keywords

sex differences; dorsal raphe nucleus; median raphe nucleus; 5-HT; elevated plus-maze

Funding

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [98/11187-2] Funding Source: FAPESP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is evidence on the existence of sex differences in the serotonergic system of the raphe. This study examines sex-based differences in serotonergic activity in the dorsal (DRN) and median (MRN) raphe nucleus; two structures that have consistently been implicated in the brain circuitry associated with fear and anxiety reactions. We also analyzed the effects of the elevated plus-maze (EPM) test, which allows the measuring of behavioral reactions to stress on rats produced by fear to height and open spaces on such sex differences. The present study was carried out on 70- to 80-day-old rats exposed or not to the EPM test. Immediately after the test, or 10-12 days later, groups of animals were sacrificed to measure serotonin (5-HT) and 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid (5-HIAA) concentration in the DRN and MRN, to calculate the serotonergic activity ([5-HIAA]/[5-HT]). Serotonergic activity in the female's DRN was consistently higher than in male's DRN. Such differences were not observed in the MRN. While exposed to the EPM test, female rats display more aversive responses than males, only during the day of diestrus 1. After the EPM test, serotonergic activity decreased in the female's DRN and in the male's MRN, both immediately and 10-12 days later. The sex-based differences in fear/anxiety reported in this study could be linked to the observed decrease in serotonergic activity in the DRN of female rats after the EPM test. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available