4.4 Article

Anaerobic digestion of dairy wastewater by inverse fluidization: The inverse fluidized bed and the inverse turbulent bed reactors

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages 1431-1443

Publisher

SELPER LTD, PUBLICATIONS DIV
DOI: 10.1080/09593330309385687

Keywords

anaerobic process; wastewater treatment; granular floating carrier; inverse fluidization technology; phospholipid analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper describes the application of the inverse fluidization technology to the anaerobic digestion of dairy wastewater. Two reactors were investigated: the inverse fluidized bed reactor and the inverse turbulent reactor. In these reactors, a granular floating solid is expanded by a down-flow current of effluent or an up-flow current of gas, respectively. The carrier particles (Extendospheres(()(TM)())) were chosen for their larp specific surface area (20,000 m(2)m(-3)) and their low energy requirements for fluidization (gas velocity of 1.5 mm s(-1), 5.4 m h(-1)). Organic load was increased stepwise by reducing hydraulic retention time from more than 60 days to 3 days, while maintaining constant the feed COD concentration. Both reactors achieved more than 90% of COD removal at an organic loading rate of 10-12 kg(COD) m(-3) d(-1), respectively. The performances observed were similar or even higher than that of other previously tested fluidized bed technologies treating the same wastewater. It was found that the main advantages of this system are: low energy requirement, because of the low fluidization velocities required; there is no need of a settling device, because solids accumulate at the bottom of the reactor, so they can be easily drawn out and particles with high-biomass content can be easily recovered. Lipid phosphate concentration has been revealed as a good method for biomass estimation in biofilms since it only includes living biomass.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available