4.8 Article

Isorhodopsin rather than rhodopsin mediates rod function in RPE65 knock-out mice

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2234461100

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NEI NIH HHS [EY04939, R01 EY012231, EY12231, R01 EY013520, R01 EY004939, EY13520] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The chromophore of visual pigments is 11-cis-retinal and, thus, in its absence, opsin is not photosensitive and no visual function exists. However, in the RPE65 knockout (Rpe65(-/-)) mouse, where synthesis of 11-cis-retinal does not occur, a minimal visual response from rod photoreceptors is obtained. We have examined if an alternative pathway exists for cis-retinoid generation in the absence of RPE65. Cyclic-light-reared, 2-month-old Rpe65(-/-) mice were placed in complete darkness. No exogenous retinoids were administered. After 4 weeks, enhanced a- and b-wave amplitudes were obtained, increasing >10-fold for the a-wave and >3-fold for the b-wave as compared with cyclic-light-reared Rpe65(-/-) mice. Visual-pigment levels increased to approximate to10 pmol per retina, compared with no measurable pigment for cyclic-light-reared Rpe65(-/-) mice. The lambda(max) of the isolated pigment was 487 nm, characteristic for isorhodopsin. Retinoid extractions confirmed the presence of 9-cis-retinal and the absence of 11-cis-retinal. Once the Rpe65(-/-) mice were returned to cyclic light, within 48 h the electroretinogram function returned to levels found in Rpe65(-/-) mice maintained in cyclic light. This dark-mediated pathway is also operational in older animals, because 13-month-old Rpe65(-/-) mice kept in prolonged darkness (12 weeks) had increased isorhodopsin levels and electroretinogram a- and b-wave amplitudes. These studies demonstrate that a pathway exists in the eye for the generation of 9-cis-retinal that is independent of RPE65 and light.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available