4.7 Article

Light-enhanced and fear-potentiated startle:: Temporal characteristics and effects of α-helical corticotropin-releasing hormone

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 54, Issue 10, Pages 1041-1048

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3223(03)00468-2

Keywords

anxiety; fear; light-enhanced startle; corticotropin-releasing hormone; time course; rats

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: It has been suggested that the light-enhanced startle paradigm (LES) is an animal model for anxiety, because of the unconditioned and nonspecific cue and the long-term effect. In contrast, the fear-potentiated startle (FPS) is suggested to model fear. In the present study, we assessed in detail the time course of LES and FPS and investigated whether corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) is differentially involved in these two models. Methods: In experiment 1, the amplitude of the startle response was tracked in the presence of the light and after light offset, in both models. In experiment 2, the effects of intracerebroventricular administration of the CRH-receptor antagonist alpha-helical CRH (0, 1, 5, and 25 mug) on LES and FPS were studied. Results: In LES, light onset resulted in a long-lasting potentiation of the startle response and a slow return to baseline after light offset. In FPS, the potentiation of the startle response returned to baseline almost immediately after light offset. Alpha-helical CRH reduced the potentiation in LES at the 5-mug dose but not at 25 mug. In FPS, a-helical CRH had no effect. Conclusions: The results show that the time course of LES is markedly different from that of FPS, which together with the differences in eliciting stimuli suggest that they model anxiety and fear, respectively. Moreover, the results suggest that CRH is involved in LES and not in FPS. Biol Psychiatry 2003;54:1041-1048 (C) 2003 Society of Biological Psychiatry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available