4.5 Article

Prospective study of clinical epidemiology of Guillain-Barre syndrome in Harbin, China

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 215, Issue 1-2, Pages 63-69

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-510X(03)00187-4

Keywords

Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS); clinical epidemiology; prognostic indicator; subgroup; prospective study

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Clinical manifestations, outcomes, prognostic indicators, and clinico-epidemiological subgroups were described based on the information of 71 patients with Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS), who were identified from a prospective survey in Harbin, China during a 1-year period from 1 October 1997 to 30 September 1998. GBS diagnoses of the patients were validated by senior neurologists and most patients were followed up for 6 months after onset. Antecedent events, mainly respiratory infections, were found in 55 (78%) patients during the month before onset. The clinical features, like motor weakness as initial symptoms (82%) and tendon areflexia or hyporeflexia (100%), are similar to those reported from other populations. However, the proportion (70%) of patients reaching to nadir less than 7 days after onset was rather high. Intravenous human immunoglobulin and/or plasmapheresis were used in 45% of the patients and steroids in 58%. At 6 months after onset, 82% of the patients could walk without aid, 46% of the patients had no any residual signs. Four (6%) patients died within 1 month due to respiratory failure. Three subgroups with different clinico-epidemiological characteristics were identified by using cluster analysis. In conclusion, GBS patients in Harbin, China were younger, had shorter time to nadir, frequently preceded by a respiratory infection, and often treated with steroids. Clinical and epidemiological differences of GBS might exist between various populations. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available