4.7 Article

Forebrain-specific trkB-receptor knockout mice:: Behaviorally more hyperactive than depressive

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 54, Issue 10, Pages 972-982

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3223(03)00418-9

Keywords

conditional knockout mice; trkB; behavior; depression model; HPA axis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: According to the neurotrophin hypothesis of depression, decreased activity of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) contributes to behavioral and plasticity-related alterations in depressed patients. We investigated the hypothesis that mice with a forebrain-specific knockout of the trkB receptor, the main mediator of BDNF signaling, represent a genetic animal model for depression. Methods: Using the CRE-loxP system, we bred trkB(CaMKII-CRE) mice with a trkB-receptor disruption in the forebrain. We subjected trkB-mutant mice to a battery of behavioral tests, comprising open field, elevated zero maze, emergence test, novel object test, and forced swim. Additionally, we investigated the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis immunohistochemically and by plasma analyses. Results: trkB(CaMKII-CRE) mice showed a stereotyped hyper-locomotion with reduced explorative activity, and impulsive reactions to novel stimuli. The trkB-mutant mice did not exhibit depressionlike behaviors such as increased despair in the forced swim test, increased anxiety in the elevated zero maze, or neophobia in the novel object test. Furthermore, no HPA dysregulation was observed under normal and stressful conditions. Conclusions: trkB(CaMKII-CRE) mice cannot be regarded as a genetic mouse model of depression. Instead, the behavioral symptoms of trkB(CaMKII-CRE) mice, comprising hyper-locomotion, stereotyped behaviors, and cognitive impairments, are similar to those postulated for mouse models of attention-deficit disorder. Biol Psychiatry 2003;54: 972-982 (C) 2003 Society of Biological Psychiatry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available