4.5 Article

Impairments in mobility and balance in relation to frailty

Journal

ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS
Volume 53, Issue 1, Pages 79-83

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2010.06.013

Keywords

Frailty index; Comprehensive geriatric assessment; Clinical frailty scale; Timed up-and-go; Functional reach; Mortality

Funding

  1. QEII Health Science Foundation
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  3. British Geriatrics Society
  4. Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh
  5. Magdalen College Oxford
  6. Wingate Foundation
  7. Dalhousie Medical Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We set out to describe the relationship between impaired balance, mobility and frailty, and relate these to risk of death. We examined a subsample of 1295 community-dwelling non-demented adults from the second wave of the Canadian Study of Health and Aging (CSHA), a prospective population-based cohort study. Frailty index (FI) scores were constructed from a standardized comprehensive geriatric assessment (FI-CGA). History of mobility impairments and falls were assessed. Timed-up-and-go (TUG) and functional reach (FR) performance were measured. The CSHA clinical frailty scale (CFS) was judged by a physician. Adverse outcomes were determined at CSHA-3, conducted 5 years later. The FI-CGA varied in association with impaired mobility and balance. A history of mobility problems was demonstrable at FI-CGA scores >0.12. This level of frailty also represented the most marked deterioration in performance measures (TUG and FR). FI-CGA scores best predicted mortality (HR 1.04 +/- 0.02), proving to be a dominating factor in multivariate regression models that included mobility and balance markers. Only at the upper range of FI-CGA reported (>0.45) did all participants demonstrate mobility impairment. Impaired balance and mobility contribute to frailty, but neither is sufficient to define a participant as frail. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available