4.7 Article

Gene expression profiling of tumor xenografts:: In vivo analysis of organ-specific metastasis

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 107, Issue 4, Pages 528-534

Publisher

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.11428

Keywords

tumor xenografts; organ-specific metastasis; gelle expression profiling; orthotopic model; CD73

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA 82713, CA 69036] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mammary carcinoma frequently metastasizes to specific organs, including the regional lymph nodes, the lung and bone marrow. The mechanisms that guide organ-specific metastasis and the molecular players that are involved remain to be established. To gain insight into this problem, we used an orthotopic model of breast cancer in which the MDA-MB-435 cells are implanted into the mouse mammary fat pad. Sublines that preferentially metastasized to specific sites were isolated by excising metastatic tumors and growing explants of these tumors in culture. Cells lines that preferentially metastasize to the lymph node and thoracic cavity were obtained. The gene expression profiles of primary tumors from these sublines were then compared with cDNA arrays containing 5,800 known genes. In tumors that preferentially metastasize to the lymph node, several genes encoding adhesion and matrix proteins were upregulated. Genes encoding proteins involved in metabolism were downregulated. One of the upregulated genes in lymph-homing tumors was CD73. Immunohistochemistry showed that the CD73 protein is also upregulated in primary tumors of this cell line and that its expression is elevated in the lymph node metastases. CD73 is a transmembrane protein that has previously been implicated in the homing of normal lymphocytes to the nodes. This raises the hypothesis that tumors preferentially metastasize to lymph nodes by using CD73 to mimic part of the lymphocyte homing process. (C) 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available