4.7 Article

Administration of the soluble complement inhibitor, Crry-Ig, reduces inflammation and aquaporin 4 expression in lupus cerebritis

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2003.09.005

Keywords

Crry-Ig; inflammation; aquaporin 4 expression; lupus cerebitis

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01DK55357, T32DK07510] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Changes in brain water and cerebral volume can lead to brain edema that may be one of the underlying causes of death in many neurological diseases. Cerebral water content is regulated by aquaporin 4 (AQ4) present in astrocytic end feet and around blood vessels. In systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies of the brain have demonstrated lesions with the prominent appearance of edema. Activation of complement may play a significant role in the pathogenesis of lupus cerebritis by causing inflammation that can lead to edema. In this study, the well-established MRL/lpr lupus mouse model was used to evaluate the role of complement in lupus cerebritis. IgG and C1q colocalized in perivascular deposits indicating that the blood-brain barrier was compromised. Both RNA and protein expressions of AQ4 were significantly increased in brains of MRL/lpr mice. Chronic administration of the soluble complement inhibitor, Crry-Ig, reduced inflammation as measured by decreased accumulation of IgG. In contrast to control MRL/lpr mice, AQ4 expression in complement inhibited MRL/lpr mice was not changed relative to untreated congenic controls. These results illustrate that complement activation in brains of lupus mice leads to enhanced AQ4 expression and inflammation. It is conceivable that increased AQ4 expression results in cerebral edema and hence complement inhibition may provide a new therapeutic option in inflammatory cerebral disorders such as lupus cerebritis. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available