4.6 Article

Monitoring molecular beacon DNA probe hybridization at the single-molecule level

Journal

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 22, Pages 5686-5692

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.200304977

Keywords

fluorescent probes; hybridization; molecular beacons; single-molecule studies; total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA 92581] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM 66137-01] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have monitored the reaction dynamics of the DNA hybridization process on a liquid/solid interface at the single-molecule level by using a hairpin-type molecular beacon DNA probe. Fluorescence images of single DNA probes were recorded by using total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy. The fluorescence signal of single DNA probes during the hybridization to individual complementary DNA probes was monitored over time. Among 400 molecular beacon DNA probes that we tracked, 349 molecular beacons (87.5%) were hybridized quickly and showed an abrupt fluorescence increase, while 51 probes (12.5%) reacted slowly, resulting in a gradual fluorescence increase. This ratio stayed about the same when varying the concentrations of cDNA in MB hybridization on the liquid/surface interface. Statistical data of the 51 single-molecule hybridization images showed that there was a multistep hybridization process. Our results also showed that photostability for the dye molecules associated with the double-stranded hybrids was better than that for those with the single-stranded molecular beacon DNA probes. Our results demonstrate the ability to obtain a better understanding of DNA hybridization processes using single-molecule techniques, which will improve biosensor and biochip development where surface-immobilized molecular beacon DNA probes provide unique advantages in signal transduction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available