4.5 Article

Clinical assessment of dehydration in older people admitted to hospital What are the strongest indicators?

Journal

ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS
Volume 47, Issue 3, Pages 340-355

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2007.08.016

Keywords

Dehydration of elderly patients; Clinical assessment of hypovolemia; Hospital dehydration prevalence; Adjusting for potential confounders; Fluid deficit

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Due to an absence of published primary data, this study explores dehydration prevalence and the change in physiological parameters frequently used to assess dehydration (fluid deficit) in older hospitalized people, as no standard measurement method exists. This observational longitudinal cohort study recruited 43 people aged 60 years or over, voluntarily admitted to a tertiary teaching hospital's Geriatric and Rehabilitation Unit (GARU). Over 40 clinical, hematological and urinary biochemical parameters employed by medical officers during dehydration assessment, identified through literature, interviews and focus group were investigated. Short-term weight changes, intra- and inter-rater repeatability of dehydration assessments were completed to assess validation and precision of the clinician's clinical dehydration assessment. Systolic blood pressure drop on standing, sternal skin turgor, tongue dryness and body mass index (BMI) were associated with hydration status; demonstrated clinically meaningful differences between groups. BMI negatively confounded the association between dehydration and systolic blood pressure drop on standing. Physical, rather than biochemical, parameters more often identified mild dehydration. The findings challenge common expectations of hematological and physiological measurement changes occurring in older people clinically assessed its dehydrated and emphasize the need to adjust for potential confounders during exploration of the associations of clinical parameters with dehydration status. Crown Copyright (C) 2007 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available