4.5 Article

Residents' involvement in the admission process in long-term care settings in France: Results of the EHPA 2000 survey

Journal

ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS
Volume 47, Issue 2, Pages 163-172

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2007.08.001

Keywords

involvement in decision; institutionalization of elderly; respect of fundamental rights of elderly

Funding

  1. French Ministry of Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to identify the factors influencing residents' involvement in the decision-making process prior to admission to it long-term care setting, we analyzed results of a national survey of residents of long-term care settings in France. We interviewed 3538 residents in 584 long-term care settings. Only 38.1% of residents said they had taken part in the admission process. Risk factors for non-involvement were the care level of the long-term care settings (odds ratio=OR=8.11 [5.63-11.68] and 2.73 [2.26-3.30], respectively, for long-term care units and retirements homes as compared to residential homes), lack of autonomy (dressing/washing) (OR = 1.95 [1.66-2.30] versus autonomous), inability to answer questions on income (OR= 2.16 [1.83-2.56]), age under 80 (OR = 1.29 [1.04-1.61]) versus >90 years old patients, and being married (OR = 1.60 [1.13-2.26]). Resident involvement in the decision-making process influenced subsequent feelings about institutional life. Older adults said that they were frequently not involved in the decision-making process prior to admission to a long-term care setting. This was particularly true for the high-care level long-term care settings, where organizational factors might intervene and for Vulnerable elders for whom loss of autonomy could be lived as a loss of citizenship. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available