4.1 Article

Caffeine and human DNA metabolism: the magic and the mystery

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2003.08.012

Keywords

caffeine; checkpoints; DNA repair; ATM; ATR; ionizing radiation; ultraviolet radiation

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P30 CA016086, R01 CA081343, CA 55065, R01 CA055065, CA 81343, P30 CA 16086] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIEHS NIH HHS [ES 11391, P30 ES010126, R01 ES011012, ES 11012, T32 ES007017, P30 ES 10126, T32 ES 07017, U19 ES011391] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ability of caffeine to reverse cell cycle checkpoint function and enhance genotoxicity after DNA damage was examined in telomerase-expressing human fibroblasts. Caffeine reversed the ATM-dependent S and G2 checkpoint responses to DNA damage induced by ionizing radiation (IR), as well as the ATR- and Chk1-dependent S checkpoint response to ultraviolet radiation (UVC). Remarkably, under conditions in which IR-induced G2 delay was reversed by caffeine, IR-induced G1 arrest was not. Incubation in caffeine did not increase the percentage of cells entering the S phase 6-8 h after irradiation; ATM-dependent phosphorylation of p53 and transactivation of p21(Cip1/Waf1) post-IR were resistant to caffeine. Caffeine alone induced a concentration- and time-dependent inhibition of DNA synthesis. It inhibited the entry of human fibroblasts into S phase by 70-80% regardless of the presence or absence of wildtype ATM or p53. Caffeine also enhanced the inhibition of cell proliferation induced by UVC in XP variant fibroblasts. This effect was reversed by expression of DNA polymerase eta, indicating that translesion synthesis of UVC-induced pyrimidine dimers by DNA pol eta protects human fibroblasts against UVC genotoxic effects even when other DNA repair functions are compromised by caffeine. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available