4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Further constraints on the African superplume structure

Journal

PHYSICS OF THE EARTH AND PLANETARY INTERIORS
Volume 140, Issue 1-3, Pages 243-251

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.pepi.2003.07.011

Keywords

African superplume; ULVZ; chemical heterogeneity; thermal anomaly

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is well established that there is a large-scale low velocity structure in the lowermost mantle beneath Africa, extending from the Southeastern Atlantic Ocean to the Southwestern Indian Ocean with a volume greater than 10 billion km(3) (>7000 km long, 1000 km across and 1200 km high) [Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 206 (2003) 119]. This low velocity structure is often called the African superplume. Various studies also require sharp boundaries for the plume. However, as for its height and shear velocity reduction, there has been some controversy, especially concerning the velocities at the core-mantle-boundary (CMB). Here, we present an assortment of phases involving S-diff, SKS, S and ScS with both vertical and horizontal paths sampling a 2D corridor through the structure. Travel time and waveform modeling of these seismic phases argues for a model with shear velocity reduction of approximately 3% within the superplume (which is basically a 200 km thick layer low velocity layer beneath the Southern Atlantic Ocean, and a 1200 km high structure beneath South Africa), and against a model of a substantially reduced low velocity layer (up to 10%, 300 km) beneath the superplume. We also analyzed P-diff and the differential times of P,,P-P and compared them with Sdiff and ScS-S observations along the same great circle paths. The P-velocity is not very anomalous, at most -0.5%, much smaller than -1% as expected from a thermal anomaly with -3% lower S-velocity [Geophys. Res. Lett. 27 (2000) 421], thus again arguing for a chemical origin which was suggested from the modeling of African superplume sharp sides [Science 296 (2002) 1850]. (C) 2003 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available