4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Tailpipe, resuspended road dust, and brake-wear emission factors from on-road vehicles

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
Volume 37, Issue 37, Pages 5283-5293

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.05.005

Keywords

urban air pollution; particulate matter; source attribution; chemical mass balance; scanning electron microscopy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Intensive mass and chemical measurements were performed at roadside locations in Reno, Nevada, and Durham/Research Triangle Park), North Carolina to derive tailpipe, resuspended road dust, and brake-wear emission factors from in-use vehicles. Continuous particulate matter (PM) data were utilized to derive total emission factors while integrated PM data were used to attribute the calculated emission factors to different mechanisms using chemical mass balance receptor modeling and scanning electron microscopy techniques. Resuspended road dust and tailpipe emissions were found to be the dominant mechanisms that contribute significantly to the total PM10 and PM2.5 emission factors, respectively. Small contributions from brake-wear were observed at locations where strong braking occurs, but no tirewear was seen at any sampling location. PM10 emission rates from light-duty spark ignition (LDSI) vehicles ranged from 40 to 780mg/km, 10 to 70mg/km, and 0 to 80mg/km per vehicle for road dust, tailpipe, and brake-wear, respectively. PM10 emission rates from heavy-duty vehicles ranged from 230 to 7800mg/km, 60 to 570mg/km, and 0 to 610mg/km per vehicle for road dust, tailpipe, and brake-wear, respectively. PM2.5 emission rates from LDSI vehicles ranged from 2 to 25mg/km, 10 to 50mg/km, and 0 to 5mg/km per vehicle for road dust, tailpipe, and brake-wear, respectively. PM2.5 emission rates from heavy-duty vehicles ranged from 15 to 300 mg/km, 60 to 480 mg/km, and 0 to 15mg/km per vehicle for road dust, tailpipe, and brake-wear, respectively. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available