4.4 Article

On the competition occurring between Aedes albopictus and Culex pipiens (Diptera:Culicidae) in Italy

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL ENTOMOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 6, Pages 1313-1321

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1603/0046-225X-32.6.1313

Keywords

Aedes albopictus; Culex pipiens; larval competition; exotic species; ecological niche

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aedes albopictus (Skuse) was detected for the first time in Italy in 1990. Thanks to its high biological adaptability, it spread rapidly to colonize various urban areas in central and northern Italy. The purpose of this study was to examine the ecological niche occupied by Ae. albopictus and the role of competition with Culex pipiens L., which is a widespread indigenous species, in urban areas. The larval development cycle and competition for food between the two species was also studied under laboratory conditions. The study showed that both species can colonize any type of artificial water container. Ae. albopictus mainly occupies saucers under flower pots and other, usually smallersized, containers, whereas Cx. pipiens tends to develop more in large tanks (100-200 liters) used in residential gardens and other larger-sized containers. It would seem that the two species interact mainly in medium-sized containers (10-50 liters) such as manholes and tires. Laboratory studies showed that, at 25degreesC, the food-biomass conversion coefficient is significantly higher in Ae. albopictus than in Cx. pipiens, indicating that the new established species is more efficient in transforming food into biomass. As a consequence, it has a greater capacity to exploit food resources and therefore grow more rapidly than Cx. pipiens. In larval association where food was scarce, it was noted that competition between the two species takes place and is influenced by temperature: at 25 +/- 2degreesC, Ae. albopictus prevails but is much less likely to do so at 20degreesC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available