4.5 Article

Targeted tissue transfection with ultrasound destruction of plasmid-bearing cationic microbubbles

Journal

ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 12, Pages 1759-1767

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0301-5629(03)00976-1

Keywords

contrast agents; contrast ultrasound; gene delivery; microbubbles; plasmid; ultrasound

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01-HL-65704, R01-HL58582, K08-HL-03810, R01-HL-48890] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK063508] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to assess the relative efficacy and mechanism of gene transfection by ultrasound (US) destruction of plasmid-bearing microbubbles. Luciferase reporter plasmid was charge-coupled to cationic lipid microbubbles. Rat hindlimb skeletal muscle was exposed to intermittent high-power US during dose-adjusted intra-arterial (IA) or IV administration of plasmid-bearing microbubbles via the carotid artery or jugular vein, respectively. At 4 days, luciferase activity in US-exposed skeletal muscle was 200-fold greater with IA than with IV administration of plasmid-bearing microbubbles, and was similar to transfection achieved by IM injection of plasmid (positive control). No transfection occurred with US and IA injection of plasmid alone. Intravital microscopy of the cremaster muscle in mice following administration of microbubbles and US exposure demonstrated perivascular deposition of fluorescent plasmid, the extent of which was twofold greater for IA compared to IV injection. Electron microscopy demonstrated a greater extent of myocellular microporations in US-exposed muscle after IA injection of microbubbles. We conclude that muscle transfection by US destruction of plasmid-bearing cationic microbubbles is amplified by IA, rather than TV, injection of microbubbles due to greater extravascular deposition of plasmid and to greater extent of myocellular microporation. (E-mail: jlindner@virginia.edu) (C) 2003 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine Biology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available