4.5 Article

Establishing the impact of acid mine drainage through metal bioaccumulation and taxa richness of benthic insects in a tropical Asian stream (The Philippines)

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY
Volume 22, Issue 12, Pages 2952-2959

Publisher

SETAC
DOI: 10.1897/02-529

Keywords

acid mine drainage; biomonitoring; mine tailings; Philippines

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Boac-Makulapnit River (The Philippines) is contaminated with heavy metals primarily due to acid mine drainage (AMD). Heavy-metal levels in river water, sediment, and algae suggest that Cu is the primary contaminant in this system. Copper concentrations decrease longitudinally, indicating a contamination gradient away from the mine. This is also reflected in the whole-body metal concentration of the caddisfly Hydropsyche, wherein higher Cu levels are observed in upstream stations (677-980 mug/g in 2001). In 2002, AMD formation was observed in a midstream station resulting from the oxidation of mine tailings in floodplains deposited during a 1996 tailings spill event. This consequently increased heavy-metal concentrations locally in environmental media and is likewise perceived to have caused the absence of aquatic insects in the midstream reach. Copper concentrations also increased in Hydropsyche found downstream of the new AMD site during this year. Furthermore, even the lower Cu concentrations in Hydropsyche observed in downstream stations are still at least six times higher than the established regional baseline value (29.9 mug/g), which is calculated from samples from clean tributary streams. These tributary streams also showed higher taxa richness for aquatic insect community in riffle zones. Both biomomtoring tools suggest that the whole length of the river is severely impacted. Rehabilitation projects will be underway next year; therefore, such monitoring programs will truly be beneficial when gauging river habitat recovery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available